A week ago, I made a post about a metric I believed determined the
NFL readiness of a NCAA prospect. In the comment section,
OBrienSchofieldismyHero asked if I could rate some of the other potential NFL prospects. In addition to rating his lovechild Scott Tolzien, I decided to rate many of the potential draftees in the 2011 NFL Draft. Most of the players are seniors because of how few juniors have declared for the NFL Draft, but I decided to include the top Juniors. Also, even though Andrew Luck stated that he would return to Stanford, I decided to rate him as well. A lot of the scores are different from the original piece because I’ve standardized the scoring in order to keep every player on a similar scale. It has to be said that the scoring favors those players with multiple years of starting experience because that’s one of the factors of these scores- the more NCAA experience, the better chance of NFL success.
The scores do not mean that a player is a better player. It just is an indicator of how NFL ready they are. The greater the number, the less of a chance for a bust. Here’s the scoring table:
95+: Immediate NFL Star
90+: Immediate NFL Starter
85+: High Level Competitor for NFL Starter
80+: Low Level Competitor for NFL Starter
75+: Immediate NFL Back-Up
70+: High Level Competitor for NFL Back-Up
65+: Low Level Competitor for NFL Back-Up
60+: 3rd Quarterback and Roster Bubble Player
60-: Training Camp Body
Now when you look at the scores, keep in mind that the score represents where the player is at this current point in time. Andrew Luck, if drafted, would have been an NFL Starter, but I believe he would have produced at the level of an NFL Back-Up. That is not because Andrew Luck is not an NFL Starter, but because he hasn’t developed enough as a quarterback to immediately step into the NFL and produce at a high level.